The British actor discusses his Golden Globe-nominated role in psychological thriller Homeland, which is screening on TV3.
This is a tough role: Brody is tortured during captivity and may be a security threat to America. Did the producers let you know what you were getting yourself in for? They were very open that they were offering me a controversial role in an ambitious project and about the fact that he was more than likely going to be a threat – in fact, the danger had to come from him; otherwise the series falls apart.
detective in Life who had been in prison for 10 years. Did that help when you were preparing for the role of Brody? Band of Brothers much less so, actually, because they have such different psychological makeups, Brody and [Major Richard] Winters. Band of Brothers
was all about the art of leadership and soldiering and the
extraordinary accomplishments of Easy Company, who helped liberate
Europe. There are more similarities with Charlie Crews in Life –
these two men are both released from prison after a long time and are
rebirthed, if you like, and given a second chance at life. There the
similarity really ends, because Crews was given a $50 million
settlement, nice cars, nice suits and women if he wanted them. Brody is
left in an altogether darker place – it’s not fantasy.
Yeah, you’re not playing Brody for laughs. No, not this time, although I’m looking forward to Homeland the Musical.
Do you think the series made Americans think about their foreign policy? There’s a much greater introspection in America. I’ve worked there a lot in the past five years, and I see a more self-analytical side to America, and Obama as the president embodies that. There’s been a massive sea change – for the good, I would argue – and the politics of the show tap into unsecured loans that. I think politically, if you wanted to use labels, it’s a liberal show, it poses these questions – what defines terrorism? There’s terror perpetrated by military groups and then there’s state terrorism.
More than 10 years after 9/11 was it the right time to explore these issues? [Producers] Alex [Gansa] and Howard [Gordon] have said publicly that they weren’t sure if there was an appetite still for this kind of thing, but even though it doesn’t dominate the papers in quite the same way, everyone knows there are different rogue elements that have sprung up everywhere now. It’s created almost more uncertainty and I think that’s what the show taps into. And it taps into bad credit loans uncertainty of our own governments and the way in which Western governments went about advocating the war on terror. It’s massively symbolic that a US marine might be enraged enough by what he sees and what he’s being asked to do that he finds cause to switch sides. It’s real and particularly alarming and I think that’s arresting for people.
No comments:
Post a Comment